On Tuesday, 1 of July 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> The appended patch fixes a regression and is considered as 2.6.26 > >> material. Everyone having a box with working suspend to RAM is gently > >> requested to test it and verify if it doesn't break things. > >> > >> The patch applies to the current -git. > > > > it's been under testing in tip/out-of-tree for about a week: > > > > | commit ee901dc1b9ab94a37ba2efc296fe9ba72bc75adf > > | Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > > | AuthorDate: Tue Jun 24 23:03:48 2008 +0200 > > | Commit: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > > | CommitDate: Wed Jun 25 18:48:13 2008 +0200 > > | > > | x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume > > > > no problems caused by it so far. > > > > Here is the incremental patch which should stick "strictly to the > script" of ljmp immediately after writing CR0.PE. This should be done > to the boot code as well; I'm waiting for confirmation from the Elan > original reporter before submitting that patch. > > I decided to make this an incremental patch to make it bisectable versus > the other one, however, it should probably be considered the right thing. > > Note: I have not tested this beyond compilation, I'm afraid. I have tested it on the nx6325 (64-bit) on top of the today's linux-next. It works fine for me. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
