On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday, 1 of July 2008, Justin Mattock wrote: >> With not knowing what I'm doing, I think I need assistance. With looking at acpi >> I decided to have a try at the dsdt.dat bit(pretty easy so far) except >> I'm being confronted with some errors, in of which >> I don't know how to resolve(still Googling for the answer) If anybody >> has any answers it would sure be appreciated. >> errors below: >> >> Intel ACPI Component Architecture >> ASL Optimizing Compiler version 20051216 [Jan 9 2006] >> Copyright (C) 2000 - 2005 Intel Corporation >> Supports ACPI Specification Revision 3.0 >> >> No back ptr to Op: type 8 >> No back ptr to Op: type 8 >> dsdt.dsl 511: If (And (PDC0, 0x08)) >> Error 1061 - Object does not exist ^ (PDC0) >> >> dsdt.dsl 514: If (And (PDC0, 0x10)) >> Error 1061 - Object does not exist ^ (PDC0) >> >> dsdt.dsl 521: If (And (PDC1, 0x08)) >> Error 1065 - ^ Object not accessible from >> this scope (PDC1) >> >> dsdt.dsl 524: If (And (PDC1, 0x10)) >> Error 1065 - ^ Object not accessible >> from this scope (PDC1) >> >> ASL Input: dsdt.dsl - 5040 lines, 171343 bytes, 1814 keywords >> Compilation complete. 4 Errors, 0 Warnings, 0 Remarks, 609 Optimizations >> >> I'm figuring if I can at least fix this, then maybe this will help >> with: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 >> acpi gpe storm regression.(or at least get me this much closer to >> figuring out what is up with that). > > Please have a look at http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/ > > Thanks, > Rafael > Cool; thanks. I'll check that out and see where and how I can locate the dsdt manufacture number, then see if I can fix the broken dsdt error and apply this to the kernel and see what happens. regards; -- Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
