* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > The appended patch fixes a regression and is considered as 2.6.26 > material. Everyone having a box with working suspend to RAM is gently > requested to test it and verify if it doesn't break things. > > The patch applies to the current -git. The fix is _really_ tempting, but i think it's 2.6.26.1 material at the earliest. I just counted about 8 red flag items in that commit: - "assembly code" - "fresh change" - "suspend/resume" - "real-mode code" - "ACPI" - "SMM" - "CPU erratas" - "boot code" I'd say it's probably 90% fine, but it's just too much risk at this stage i think. The regression was only found 2 weeks ago, and the commit that broke it was upstream for 2 months (and was under testing for about 4 months). [ We have to try to shorten the test cycle for such problems. Hopefully in v2.6.27 we'll have CONFIG_PM_TEST_SUSPEND=y :-) ] Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
