On Friday, 27 of June 2008, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Well, actually, I'm not sure that will work. I have only found > > acpi_skip_timer_override being set to 1 in two places, but it doesn't seem to > > be read anywhere. What am I missing? > > I believe I removed all the occurences. I am waiting for a proposal of a > quirk based on the DSDT ID -- my time is a bit too limited to study the > internals of our ACPI code at the moment; sorry about that. I will > complement it with a change to remove IRQ0 from I/O APIC tables as > promised then; this piece of code I am quite familiar with. Well, why don't we use the DMI identification as suggested by Matthew? I think we can safely assume that all of these boxes are broken for now and we can use a more fine grained identification in the future, if necessary. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
