Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, it's been promoted from a u8, so no need for that anyway, but <shrug>. My logic is that in commit 95b24192cf27631dc11541e97c430389320e7a93 it says the following: ACPI Extended Interrupt Descriptors can encode 32-bit interrupt numbers, so an interrupt number may exceed the size of the bitmap we use to track possible IRQ settings. so the field in 'struct acpi_resource_irq' might at some point increase to be a 32-bit unsigned value. Otherwise there's no point having the check at all, right? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
