On Tuesday, 24 of June 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > What does ACPI claim the trip points are set to in this case? On the > > > 6125, if IRQ 2 is enabled in the APIC then the DSDT sets all the thermal > > > trip points to 16 degrees C. I suspect this means that enabling IRQ 2 is > > > the wrong thing to do on this chipset. > > > > Ah, indeed, thanks for the hint. This is the output of > > > > $ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/TZ*/trip_points > > > > in the failing case: > > > > critical (S5): 105 C > > passive: 16 C: tc1=1 tc2=2 tsp=100 devices=C000 C001 > > active[0]: 16 C: devices=C34F > > active[1]: 16 C: devices=C350 > > active[2]: 16 C: devices=C351 > > active[3]: 16 C: devices=C352 > > critical (S5): 100 C > > passive: 16 C: tc1=1 tc2=2 tsp=300 devices=C000 C001 > > critical (S5): 100 C > > passive: 16 C: tc1=1 tc2=2 tsp=300 devices=C000 C001 > > Can we call the ACPI BIOS to be terminally broken at this point? It is broken, but the configuration worked before the patch. Consequently, the patch introduces a regression. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
