I guess the 'INTA#; rather than 'INTA' syntax I'm not fond of appears in this x86 patch too. I think if we don't really have anything useful to say about polarity, then we should not add an active low symbol. thanks, -Len - printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: %s IRQ %d for device %s\n", msg, irq, pci_name(dev)); + dev_info(&dev->dev, "%s PCI INT%c# -> IRQ %d\n", msg, 'A' + pin, irq); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
