On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 03:43:27AM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > extern struct acpi_dmtable_info acpi_dm_table_info_dmar1[]; > > +extern struct acpi_dmtable_info acpi_dm_table_info_dmar2[]; > > extern struct acpi_dmtable_info acpi_dm_table_info_ecdt[]; > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but we don't actually seem to have the > disassembler code in Linux? It would be nice if we did (as a debug > option) - I'd love to be able to dump a disassembled version of what's > actually getting executed in response to events. this patch and others like it are obviously just to keep Linux in sync with ACPICA to minimize the diff we must track. But there is actually quite a bit in ACPICA that is not in Linux. The most useful, from a debugging point of view, might be the hooking the ACPICA debug code into the kernel debugger -- something that Luming did about 2 years ago. However, as the debugger was not part of the Linux kernel tree, the changes didn't really have a good path to a customer... -Len -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
