Re: linux-next Regression: Unable to locate IOAPIC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> To clarify myself:
> >> 2.6.25.5:  --> relatively fast no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
> >> 2.6.26-rc5:   --> relatively  no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
> >> 2.6.26-rc5 + git-acpi Patch:   --> relatively  no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
> >> 2.6.26-rc5 +  linux-next snapshot 20080604 --> even slower than before
> >> my ide Patch many "unable to locate IOAPIC" Errors
> >>
> >>
> >> So I think the problem lies not in the acpi tree but somewhre else.
> >>
> >> Is it possible to tell git to explicitly _exclude_ a specific tree while
> >> bisecting?
>
> can you check if the attached patch fix the problem?
> it will not check entries before MP_intsrc_info...
This fixed it, thanks :)

Also maschine feels not as fast as with 2.6.25.x but noticeable faster :)

I guss you no longer need the complete dmesg output?

Greetings
Daniel Exner
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux