Re: [patch 17/18] ISAPNP: handle independent options following dependent ones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05-06-08 00:09, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

The ISAPNP spec recommends that independent options precede
dependent ones, but this is not actually required.  The current
ISAPNP code incorrectly puts such trailing independent options
at the end of the last dependent option list.

This patch fixes that bug by resetting the current option list
to the independent list when we see an "End Dependent Functions"
tag.  PNPBIOS and PNPACPI handle this the same way.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>

Rene.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux