On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:29:10 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Andrew Morton wrote: >> > On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:30:28 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > Andrew Morton wrote: >> > > > (cc linux-acpi) >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:12 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > > > > Hi! >> > > > > >> > > > > (Added myself to CC, because I'm not subscribed) >> > > > > >> > > > > with linux-next snapshot 20080604 my Laptop morphes into sitting duck >> > > > > and I think this is due to this: >> > > > >> > > > I assume 2.6.26-rc5 is OK? >> > > >> > > Indeed.. just tried it with (nearly) the same config: no unable to locate >> > > IOAPIC >> > > >> > > Will try todays next snapshot above -rc5 now. >> > >> > OK, thanks. >> > >> > It would be great if you could test 2.6.26-rc5 plus >> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-acpi.patch. That'll allow us to >> > confirm that the regression is due to changes in the acpi tree. >> Sorry for the delay.. real-life you know ;) >> >> I guess you'd expect me to confirm the behavior on rc5 with this patch aplied, >> but .. well this Kernel works! >> >> So I think the regression is NOT in the acpi tree. Perhaps pci subsystem? > > There is behind-the-scenes finger-pointing going on ;) > > I don't think we know what caused this regression, sorry. > >> If I find time I'll try bisecting it.. > > That would be fantastic, thanks. Please don't let us merge this > regression into 2.6.27. We have a few weeks. i'm confused. 2.6.26-rc5 is OK or not? where is whole boot log for works kernel? also the config please. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
