On 04-06-08 22:50, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 05:48:27 am Rene Herman wrote:
On 04-06-08 01:52, Rene Herman wrote:
ADS7181 in fact might as well delete the IRQ from the dependents and add
"irq 2/9,10,11 High-Edge Optinal" in front as an independent same as
ADS7151. That way, all the cloning can go.
We currently clone for AZT0002 as well as ADS7181. Can we do the
same for both? It would be nice to get rid of the cloning code
if we can.
Yes. AZT0002 (the MPU401 on an AZT2320 chip) is the exact same as
ADS7181 (the MPU401 on an AD1816 chip).
IORESOURCE_IRQ_OPTIONAL clears the path for doing things better. I see
its dependent 2 can then just go entirely in fact.
Hardware says:
Dependent: 00 - Priority preferred
irq 2/9 High-Edge
port 0x330-0x330, align 0xf, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding
Dependent: 01 - Priority acceptable
irq 2/9 High-Edge
port 0x300-0x330, align 0xf, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding
Dependent: 02 - Priority functional
irq 2/9,10,11 High-Edge
port 0x300-0x330, align 0xf, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding
We want it to end up as:
irq 2/9,10,11 High-Edge (Optional)
Dependent: 00 - Priority preferred
port 0x330-0x330, align 0xf, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding
Dependent: 01 - Priority acceptable
port 0x300-0x330, align 0xf, size 0x2, 16-bit address decoding
So walk dependents deleting IRQs, except last dependent IRQ which is
cloned into a new independent (inserted in front would be best for
ISAPnP since the spec does recommend this) while making it optional and
then just delete the last dependent completely (it would be same as the
previous dependent after all).
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
