On Tuesday 03 June 2008 11:37:05 am Rene Herman wrote: > > Index: work10/include/linux/ioport.h > > =================================================================== > > --- work10.orig/include/linux/ioport.h 2008-05-20 13:34:58.000000000 -0600 > > +++ work10/include/linux/ioport.h 2008-05-20 13:39:21.000000000 -0600 > > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct resource_list { > > #define IORESOURCE_IRQ_HIGHLEVEL (1<<2) > > #define IORESOURCE_IRQ_LOWLEVEL (1<<3) > > #define IORESOURCE_IRQ_SHAREABLE (1<<4) > > +#define IORESOURCE_IRQ_OPTIONAL (1<<5) > > > > /* ISA PnP DMA specific bits (IORESOURCE_BITS) */ > > #define IORESOURCE_DMA_TYPE_MASK (3<<0) > > Andrew scooped up a patch from a previous reaction of mine that deleted > the "ISA " from these comments. I tend to use comments as a great way of > avoiding actually reading code (I'm silly like that) and so as to be > burned a _bit_ less by it, I think it's good if they're accurate. In > this case for example, one might be tempted to assume these bits were > specific to drivers/pnp/isapnp. Yes, I see that's pnpacpi-fix-irq-flag-decoding-comment-fix.patch in mmotm. How about if I incorporate that in my series (the one Andrew hasn't yet picked up), since your patch will otherwise conflict with it? Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html