On Wed, 28 May 2008 14:33:49 +0100 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send a switch event on docking for consistency with docks that don't
> present as a separate device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> index fa44fb9..a67e74c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/input.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ struct dock_station {
> struct mutex hp_lock;
> struct list_head dependent_devices;
> struct list_head hotplug_devices;
> + struct input_dev *dock_input;
> };
>
> struct dock_dependent_device {
> @@ -345,10 +347,13 @@ static void dock_event(struct dock_station *ds, u32 event, int num)
> char event_string[13];
> char *envp[] = { event_string, NULL };
>
> - if (num == UNDOCK_EVENT)
> + if (num == UNDOCK_EVENT) {
> + input_report_switch(dock_station->dock_input, SW_DOCK, 0);
Is CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=y, CONFIG_INPUT=n possible? I think so..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
