On Friday 09 May 2008, Zhang Rui wrote: > Hi, all, > > In order to reduce the ACPI regressions for each release, > we plan to do an ACPI regression test every time before/after there is > an import push to linus's tree from len, i.e. before/after ACPI patches > for Linux-2.6.xx-rc1 are merged. > > As this is the first step, we only do some basic tests for the problems > which are usually seen in bugzilla and do the tests manually. > > test case 1: Sytem boot. Check if it can boot with no errors. > test case 2: s3 test. Try suspend to memory 5 times in a row. > test case 3: cpu p-state c-state. Poke the cpu c/p-state sysfs I/F and > see if it work well. > test case 4: battery/ac. Check if the state is update correctly. > test case 5: fan/thermal. Try to heat the system and see if the > fan/processor state is changed upon trip point. > test case 6: video/backlight. For the laptops that follow the ACPI video > extension, check if hotkey and backlight sysfs I/F is > working correctly. > test case 7: Event. Try to trigger AC/Battery/Button/Processor/Thermal > events and see if they are tiggered/exported to userspace. > test case 8: shutdown. Check if shutdown works, > including before and after S3 test. > > If you think something else is worth testing or have question on the > test result, please let us know, any comments are appreciated. Do all of these pass with 2.6.25.stable? How are these test related to ABAT? http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/validation.php Perhaps we should archive the test results on the validation page above? thanks, -len -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
