On Monday, 12 of May 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > @@ -157,6 +157,11 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. > > default: The hardware signature is checked during > > resume from S4. > > > > + acpi_old_suspend_ordering [HW,ACPI] ACPI suspend ordering > > + Enforce the ACPI 1.0 ordering of the _PTS control > > + method wrt putting devices into low power states > > + default: ACPI 2.0 ordering of _PTS > > + > > acpi_sci= [HW,ACPI] ACPI System Control Interrupt trigger mode > > Format: { level | edge | high | low } > > > > Hmm, I have a wild idea... > > acpi_sleep=old_ordering > > ...and reuse the same variable we already use for > s3_bios/s3_mode. Then, we'd be able to blacklist the systems needing > old_ordering from s2ram... > > I guess this whitelist should better be done in kernel, but short-term > ability to whitelist from userland could not hurt...? There's one problem with that, acpi_sleep is x86-specific and it's actually handled in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c . Well, ok, I think I can handle that, but it won't look nice. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html