Re: 2.6.25 pci=noacpi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 08:23 +0100, Richard wrote:
> Thomas Renninger wrote:
...

> >>>> thanks - the idle=poll works to fix the problem.
> >>>>         
> >>> Well, that's hardly a "fix".  The power consumption will be very high.
> >>>
> >> Hehehe, its a start. A booting kernel is definitely a good start (even 
> >> one what drinks battery). I have some avenues in the source to 
> >> investigate, but being a ACPI n00bie its trying to get my head around 
> >> the mass of code thats a daunting task.
> >>     
> > Richard, could you try processor.max_cstate=2 (or even 1), pls (without
> > noapictimer).
> > Or you can double check whether you have cstates at all first(when
> > booting with noapictimer):
> > cat /proc/acpi/processor/*/power
> >
> > Vendors often invalidate deeper sleep states with an invalid latency.
> > Maybe this has been forgotten here, Windows does not use deeper C-state
> > or it works there for some reason.
> > If this works for you, please send dmidecode output.
> > IMO we should then blacklist this machine in
> > drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c to not use the offending sleep state.
> > There already is a blacklist.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >    Thomas
> >
> >
> >   
> Hi Thomas (and all)
> 
> I tried the processor.max_cstate=2 to no avail.   on a 23, 24 and a .25 
> kernel :-P   The machine shuts  down just after INIT  starts.
Could you also try processor.max_cstate=1 (one kernel is enough, just a
quick test... )
The culprit is in the idle routine and there just the C-states are
triggered..., it should be related to C-states.

> ------------- This is reported when booted with noapictimer ----------------
> cat /proc/acpi/processor/*/power
> active state:            C0
> max_cstate:              C8
> bus master activity:     00000000
> maximum allowed latency: 6666 usec
> states:
>     C1:                  type[C1] promotion[--] demotion[--] 
> latency[000] usage[00082490] duration[00000000000000000000]
>     C2:                  type[C2] promotion[--] demotion[--] 
> latency[018] usage[00000000] duration[00000000000000000000]
I wonder why even C2 is not entered with noapictimer...
>     C3:                  type[C3] promotion[--] demotion[--] 
> latency[083] usage[00000000] duration[00000000000000000000]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  Thomas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux