Re: [PATCH 2/4] APM emulation: Notify about all suspend events, not just APM invoked ones (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This revamps the apm-emulation code to get suspend notifications
> regardless of what way pm_suspend() was invoked, whether via the
> apm ioctl or via /sys/power/state. Also do some code cleanup and
> add comments while at it.

Please always do cleanups & comment adds _before_ changing the code.

This is probably okay, but... it is quite hard to tell.


> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>


> ---
> 
>  drivers/char/apm-emulation.c |  346 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 207 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/apm-emulation.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/apm-emulation.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/apm-emulation.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,55 @@ struct apm_queue {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> + * thread states (for threads using a writable /dev/apm_bios fd):
> + *
> + * SUSPEND_NONE:	nothing happening
> + * SUSPEND_PENDING:	suspend event queued for thread and pending to be read
> + * SUSPEND_READ:	suspend event read, pending acknowledgement
> + * SUSPEND_ACKED:	acknowledgement received from thread (via ioctl),
> + *			waiting for resume
> + * SUSPEND_ACKTO:	acknowledgement timeout
> + * SUSPEND_DONE:	thread had acked suspend and is now notified of
> + *			resume
> + *
> + * SUSPEND_WAIT:	this thread invoked suspend and is waiting for resume
> + *
> + * A thread migrates in one of three paths:
> + * 	NONE -1-> PENDING -2-> READ -3-> ACKED -4-> DONE -5-> NONE
> + *	                            -6-> ACKTO -7-> NONE
> + *	NONE -8-> WAIT -9-> NONE
> + *
> + * While in PENDING or READ, the thread is accounted for in the
> + * suspend_acks_pending counter.
> + *
> + * The transitions are invoked as follows:
> + *	1: suspend event is signalled from the core PM code
> + *	2: the suspend event is read from the fd by the userspace thread
> + *	3: userspace thread issues the APM_IOC_SUSPEND ioctl (as ack)
> + *	4: core PM code signals that we have resumed
> + *	5: APM_IOC_SUSPEND ioctl returns
> + *
> + *	6: the notifier invoked from the core PM code timed out waiting
> + *	   for all relevant threds to enter ACKED state and puts those
> + *	   that haven't into ACKTO
> + *	7: those threads issue APM_IOC_SUSPEND ioctl too late,
> + *	   get an error
> + *
> + *	8: userspace thread issues the APM_IOC_SUSPEND ioctl (to suspend),
> + *	   ioctl code invokes pm_suspend()
> + *	9: pm_suspend() returns indicating resume
> + */
> +enum apm_suspend_state {
> +	SUSPEND_NONE,
> +	SUSPEND_PENDING,
> +	SUSPEND_READ,
> +	SUSPEND_ACKED,
> +	SUSPEND_ACKTO,
> +	SUSPEND_WAIT,
> +	SUSPEND_DONE,
> +};
> +
> +/*
>   * The per-file APM data
>   */
>  struct apm_user {
> @@ -68,13 +117,7 @@ struct apm_user {
>  	unsigned int		reader: 1;
>  
>  	int			suspend_result;
> -	unsigned int		suspend_state;
> -#define SUSPEND_NONE	0		/* no suspend pending */
> -#define SUSPEND_PENDING	1		/* suspend pending read */
> -#define SUSPEND_READ	2		/* suspend read, pending ack */
> -#define SUSPEND_ACKED	3		/* suspend acked */
> -#define SUSPEND_WAIT	4		/* waiting for suspend */
> -#define SUSPEND_DONE	5		/* suspend completed */
> +	enum apm_suspend_state	suspend_state;
>  
>  	struct apm_queue	queue;
>  };
> @@ -82,7 +125,8 @@ struct apm_user {
>  /*
>   * Local variables
>   */
> -static int suspends_pending;
> +static atomic_t suspend_acks_pending = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +static atomic_t userspace_notification_inhibit = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>  static int apm_disabled;
>  static struct task_struct *kapmd_tsk;
>  
> @@ -165,78 +209,6 @@ static void queue_event(apm_event_t even
>  	wake_up_interruptible(&apm_waitqueue);
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * queue_suspend_event - queue an APM suspend event.
> - *
> - * Check that we're in a state where we can suspend.  If not,
> - * return -EBUSY.  Otherwise, queue an event to all "writer"
> - * users.  If there are no "writer" users, return '1' to
> - * indicate that we can immediately suspend.
> - */
> -static int queue_suspend_event(apm_event_t event, struct apm_user *sender)
> -{
> -	struct apm_user *as;
> -	int ret = 1;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&state_lock);
> -	down_read(&user_list_lock);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If a thread is still processing, we can't suspend, so reject
> -	 * the request.
> -	 */
> -	list_for_each_entry(as, &apm_user_list, list) {
> -		if (as != sender && as->reader && as->writer && as->suser &&
> -		    as->suspend_state != SUSPEND_NONE) {
> -			ret = -EBUSY;
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	list_for_each_entry(as, &apm_user_list, list) {
> -		if (as != sender && as->reader && as->writer && as->suser) {
> -			as->suspend_state = SUSPEND_PENDING;
> -			suspends_pending++;
> -			queue_add_event(&as->queue, event);
> -			ret = 0;
> -		}
> -	}
> - out:
> -	up_read(&user_list_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
> -	wake_up_interruptible(&apm_waitqueue);
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static void apm_suspend(void)
> -{
> -	struct apm_user *as;
> -	int err = pm_suspend(PM_SUSPEND_MEM);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Anyone on the APM queues will think we're still suspended.
> -	 * Send a message so everyone knows we're now awake again.
> -	 */
> -	queue_event(APM_NORMAL_RESUME);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Finally, wake up anyone who is sleeping on the suspend.
> -	 */
> -	mutex_lock(&state_lock);
> -	down_read(&user_list_lock);
> -	list_for_each_entry(as, &apm_user_list, list) {
> -		if (as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_WAIT ||
> -		    as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_ACKED) {
> -			as->suspend_result = err;
> -			as->suspend_state = SUSPEND_DONE;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	up_read(&user_list_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
> -
> -	wake_up(&apm_suspend_waitqueue);
> -}
> -
>  static ssize_t apm_read(struct file *fp, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>  {
>  	struct apm_user *as = fp->private_data;
> @@ -307,25 +279,22 @@ apm_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct f
>  
>  		as->suspend_result = -EINTR;
>  
> -		if (as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_READ) {
> -			int pending;
> -
> +		switch (as->suspend_state) {
> +		case SUSPEND_READ:
>  			/*
>  			 * If we read a suspend command from /dev/apm_bios,
>  			 * then the corresponding APM_IOC_SUSPEND ioctl is
>  			 * interpreted as an acknowledge.
>  			 */
>  			as->suspend_state = SUSPEND_ACKED;
> -			suspends_pending--;
> -			pending = suspends_pending == 0;
> +			atomic_dec(&suspend_acks_pending);
>  			mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
>  
>  			/*
> -			 * If there are no further acknowledges required,
> -			 * suspend the system.
> +			 * suspend_acks_pending changed, the notifier needs to
> +			 * be woken up for this
>  			 */
> -			if (pending)
> -				apm_suspend();
> +			wake_up(&apm_suspend_waitqueue);
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * Wait for the suspend/resume to complete.  If there
> @@ -341,35 +310,21 @@ apm_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct f
>  			 * try_to_freeze() in freezer_count() will not trigger
>  			 */
>  			freezer_count();
> -		} else {
> +			break;
> +		case SUSPEND_ACKTO:
> +			as->suspend_result = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +			mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
> +			break;
> +		default:
>  			as->suspend_state = SUSPEND_WAIT;
>  			mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * Otherwise it is a request to suspend the system.
> -			 * Queue an event for all readers, and expect an
> -			 * acknowledge from all writers who haven't already
> -			 * acknowledged.
> -			 */
> -			err = queue_suspend_event(APM_USER_SUSPEND, as);
> -			if (err < 0) {
> -				/*
> -				 * Avoid taking the lock here - this
> -				 * should be fine.
> -				 */
> -				as->suspend_state = SUSPEND_NONE;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -
> -			if (err > 0)
> -				apm_suspend();
> -
> -			/*
> -			 * Wait for the suspend/resume to complete.  If there
> -			 * are pending acknowledges, we wait here for them.
> +			 * Just invoke pm_suspend(), we'll handle it from
> +			 * there via the notifier.
>  			 */
> -			wait_event_freezable(apm_suspend_waitqueue,
> -					 as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_DONE);
> +			as->suspend_result = pm_suspend(PM_SUSPEND_MEM);
>  		}
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&state_lock);
> @@ -385,7 +340,6 @@ apm_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct f
>  static int apm_release(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
>  {
>  	struct apm_user *as = filp->private_data;
> -	int pending = 0;
>  
>  	filp->private_data = NULL;
>  
> @@ -395,18 +349,15 @@ static int apm_release(struct inode * in
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We are now unhooked from the chain.  As far as new
> -	 * events are concerned, we no longer exist.  However, we
> -	 * need to balance suspends_pending, which means the
> -	 * possibility of sleeping.
> +	 * events are concerned, we no longer exist.
>  	 */
>  	mutex_lock(&state_lock);
> -	if (as->suspend_state != SUSPEND_NONE) {
> -		suspends_pending -= 1;
> -		pending = suspends_pending == 0;
> -	}
> +	if (as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_PENDING ||
> +	    as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_READ)
> +		atomic_dec(&suspend_acks_pending);
>  	mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
> -	if (pending)
> -		apm_suspend();
> +
> +	wake_up(&apm_suspend_waitqueue);
>  
>  	kfree(as);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -542,7 +493,6 @@ static int kapmd(void *arg)
>  {
>  	do {
>  		apm_event_t event;
> -		int ret;
>  
>  		wait_event_interruptible(kapmd_wait,
>  				!queue_empty(&kapmd_queue) || kthread_should_stop());
> @@ -567,20 +517,13 @@ static int kapmd(void *arg)
>  
>  		case APM_USER_SUSPEND:
>  		case APM_SYS_SUSPEND:
> -			ret = queue_suspend_event(event, NULL);
> -			if (ret < 0) {
> -				/*
> -				 * We were busy.  Try again in 50ms.
> -				 */
> -				queue_add_event(&kapmd_queue, event);
> -				msleep(50);
> -			}
> -			if (ret > 0)
> -				apm_suspend();
> +			pm_suspend(PM_SUSPEND_MEM);
>  			break;
>  
>  		case APM_CRITICAL_SUSPEND:
> -			apm_suspend();
> +			atomic_inc(&userspace_notification_inhibit);
> +			pm_suspend(PM_SUSPEND_MEM);
> +			atomic_dec(&userspace_notification_inhibit);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	} while (1);
> @@ -588,6 +531,120 @@ static int kapmd(void *arg)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int apm_suspend_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +				unsigned long event,
> +				void *dummy)
> +{
> +	struct apm_user *as;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	/* short-cut emergency suspends */
> +	if (atomic_read(&userspace_notification_inhibit))
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	switch (event) {
> +	case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> +		/*
> +		 * Queue an event to all "writer" users that we want
> +		 * to suspend and need their ack.
> +		 */
> +		mutex_lock(&state_lock);
> +		down_read(&user_list_lock);
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry(as, &apm_user_list, list) {
> +			if (as->suspend_state != SUSPEND_WAIT && as->reader &&
> +			    as->writer && as->suser) {
> +				as->suspend_state = SUSPEND_PENDING;
> +				atomic_inc(&suspend_acks_pending);
> +				queue_add_event(&as->queue, APM_USER_SUSPEND);
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		up_read(&user_list_lock);
> +		mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
> +		wake_up_interruptible(&apm_waitqueue);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Wait for the the suspend_acks_pending variable to drop to
> +		 * zero, meaning everybody acked the suspend event (or the
> +		 * process was killed.)
> +		 *
> +		 * If the app won't answer within a short while we assume it
> +		 * locked up and ignore it.
> +		 */
> +		err = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(
> +			apm_suspend_waitqueue,
> +			atomic_read(&suspend_acks_pending) == 0,
> +			5*HZ);
> +
> +		/* timed out */
> +		if (err == 0) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Move anybody who timed out to "ack timeout" state.
> +			 *
> +			 * We could time out and the userspace does the ACK
> +			 * right after we time out but before we enter the
> +			 * locked section here, but that's fine.
> +			 */
> +			mutex_lock(&state_lock);
> +			down_read(&user_list_lock);
> +			list_for_each_entry(as, &apm_user_list, list) {
> +				if (as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_PENDING ||
> +				    as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_READ) {
> +					as->suspend_state = SUSPEND_ACKTO;
> +					atomic_dec(&suspend_acks_pending);
> +				}
> +			}
> +			up_read(&user_list_lock);
> +			mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
> +		}
> +
> +		/* let suspend proceed */
> +		if (err >= 0)
> +			return NOTIFY_OK;
> +
> +		/* interrupted by signal */
> +		return NOTIFY_BAD;
> +
> +	case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> +		/*
> +		 * Anyone on the APM queues will think we're still suspended.
> +		 * Send a message so everyone knows we're now awake again.
> +		 */
> +		queue_event(APM_NORMAL_RESUME);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Finally, wake up anyone who is sleeping on the suspend.
> +		 */
> +		mutex_lock(&state_lock);
> +		down_read(&user_list_lock);
> +		list_for_each_entry(as, &apm_user_list, list) {
> +			if (as->suspend_state == SUSPEND_ACKED) {
> +				/*
> +				 * TODO: maybe grab error code, needs core
> +				 * changes to push the error to the notifier
> +				 * chain (could use the second parameter if
> +				 * implemented)
> +				 */
> +				as->suspend_result = 0;
> +				as->suspend_state = SUSPEND_DONE;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		up_read(&user_list_lock);
> +		mutex_unlock(&state_lock);
> +
> +		wake_up(&apm_suspend_waitqueue);
> +		return NOTIFY_OK;
> +
> +	default:
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block apm_notif_block = {
> +	.notifier_call = apm_suspend_notifier,
> +};
> +
>  static int __init apm_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -601,7 +658,7 @@ static int __init apm_init(void)
>  	if (IS_ERR(kapmd_tsk)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(kapmd_tsk);
>  		kapmd_tsk = NULL;
> -		return ret;
> +		goto out;
>  	}
>  	wake_up_process(kapmd_tsk);
>  
> @@ -610,16 +667,27 @@ static int __init apm_init(void)
>  #endif
>  
>  	ret = misc_register(&apm_device);
> -	if (ret != 0) {
> -		remove_proc_entry("apm", NULL);
> -		kthread_stop(kapmd_tsk);
> -	}
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_stop;
>  
> +	ret = register_pm_notifier(&apm_notif_block);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_unregister;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> + out_unregister:
> +	misc_deregister(&apm_device);
> + out_stop:
> +	remove_proc_entry("apm", NULL);
> +	kthread_stop(kapmd_tsk);
> + out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void __exit apm_exit(void)
>  {
> +	unregister_pm_notifier(&apm_notif_block);
>  	misc_deregister(&apm_device);
>  	remove_proc_entry("apm", NULL);
>  

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux