On Sunday 04 May 2008 08:19:54 am Rene Herman wrote: > On 04-05-08 16:14, Rene Herman wrote: > > > In trying to come up with problems I'm only finding a difference in an > > added failure mode with respect to the static array if we run out of > > memory at a bad time and this is quite unserious. > > I mean, this would be an added mode when just releasing and rbuilding teh > list as opposed to teh reusing, it's not a diffeerence with respect to the > .index setup. > > So, going to completely slash struct pnp_resource again? :) Would improve > things... It would be nice to get rid of struct pnp_resource, but then I wouldn't have a place to keep the list pointer. But I think it will disappear from most of the interfaces, e.g,. we can get rid of pnp_get_pnp_resource(), etc. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
