From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> x86.git testing found the following build error on latest -git: drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function 'acpi_numa_init': drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: 'NR_NODE_MEMBLKS' undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: for each function it appears in.) with this config: http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Apr_30_22_42_42_CEST_2008.bad i suspect we dont want SRAT parsing when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT is unset - but the fix looks a bit ugly. Perhaps we should define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS even in this case and just let the code fall back to some sane behavior? Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/numa.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff -puN drivers/acpi/numa.c~acpi-acpi_numa_init-build-fix drivers/acpi/numa.c --- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c~acpi-acpi_numa_init-build-fix +++ a/drivers/acpi/numa.c @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ acpi_parse_processor_affinity(struct acp return 0; } +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT static int __init acpi_parse_memory_affinity(struct acpi_subtable_header * header, const unsigned long end) @@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ acpi_parse_memory_affinity(struct acpi_s return 0; } +#endif static int __init acpi_parse_srat(struct acpi_table_header *table) { @@ -221,9 +223,11 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void) if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) { acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY, acpi_parse_processor_affinity, NR_CPUS); +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY, acpi_parse_memory_affinity, NR_NODE_MEMBLKS); +#endif } /* SLIT: System Locality Information Table */ _ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
