On Wednesday, 30 of April 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:20:11 -0400 > Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Linus, > > > > please pull from: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release > > > > This batch is a proper super-set of the pull request I made a week ago. > > It will update the files shown below. > > > > > I have four acpi-related reports here from 2.6.25-rcX-mmY. Can you please check > that they were addressed? I don't recall seeing any feedback for any of > them. > > Thanks. > > > > > > From: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, len.brown@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 -- initcall acpi_init+0x0/0x216() returned with preemption imbalance > Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:41:17 -0400 > > Is this indicative of a kernel or hardware problem? > > [ 0.279606] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing > [ 0.279789] initcall acpi_init+0x0/0x216() returned with preemption imbalance > [ 0.330789] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) > > > > From: "Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Len Brown" <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:55 +0800 > > Hi, I got the following lockdep warning: > (add linux-acpi to cc) > > [ 0.097109] ACPI: Core revision 20070126 > [ 0.097282] INFO: trying to register non-static key. > [ 0.097355] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. > [ 0.097428] turning off the locking correctness validator. > [ 0.097503] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 #3 > [ 0.097578] [<c0127bf8>] ? printk+0x18/0x20 > [ 0.097716] [<c014b01c>] __lock_acquire+0x40c/0x760 > [ 0.097822] [<c0181ba0>] ? alloc_debug_processing+0xb0/0x140 > [ 0.097959] [<c014b969>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 > [ 0.098063] [<c0140204>] ? down_trylock+0x14/0x40 > [ 0.098197] [<c03df9e8>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0xa0 > [ 0.098303] [<c0140204>] ? down_trylock+0x14/0x40 > [ 0.098436] [<c0140204>] down_trylock+0x14/0x40 > [ 0.098540] [<c027c7ea>] acpi_os_wait_semaphore+0x3e/0xb9 > [ 0.098647] [<c029263e>] acpi_ut_acquire_mutex+0x34/0x72 > [ 0.098753] [<c0289ab1>] acpi_ns_root_initialize+0x19/0x250 > [ 0.098859] [<c05453e6>] acpi_initialize_subsystem+0x42/0x64 > [ 0.098966] [<c0545725>] acpi_early_init+0x50/0xef > [ 0.099070] [<c052b7f6>] start_kernel+0x1e6/0x250 > [ 0.099175] [<c052b1a0>] ? unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x130 > [ 0.099310] [<c052b008>] __init_begin+0x8/0x10 > [ 0.099414] ======================= > > > > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, len.brown@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (build failure) > Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:32:25 -0800 > Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. > X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/ > > When SMP=n, x86_64 build gets: > > arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `acpi_save_state_mem': > (.text+0xfd7f): undefined reference to `setup_trampoline' > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 This code has already been merged via the x86 tree, with the problem fixed IIRC (at least it hasn't been reported against the mainline so far). Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
