Hi Rui,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:11:54 +0800, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> Build the generic thermal driver as module "thermal_sys".
>
> Make ACPI thermal, video, processor and fan SELECT the generic
> thermal driver, as these drivers rely on it to build the sysfs I/F.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 4 +++-
> drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> drivers/thermal/Makefile | 3 ++-
> drivers/thermal/thermal.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/thermal.h | 14 --------------
> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> #
>
> menuconfig THERMAL
> - bool "Generic Thermal sysfs driver"
> + tristate "Generic Thermal sysfs driver"
> help
> Generic Thermal Sysfs driver offers a generic mechanism for
> thermal management. Usually it's made up of one or more thermal
> @@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ menuconfig THERMAL
> Each thermal zone contains its own temperature, trip points,
> cooling devices.
> All platforms with ACPI thermal support can use this driver.
> - If you want this support, you should say Y here.
> + If you want this support, you should say Y or M here.
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
> #include <linux/thermal.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> -MODULE_AUTHOR("Zhang Rui")
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Zhang Rui");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic thermal management sysfs support");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> @@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
> # Makefile for sensor chip drivers.
> #
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_THERMAL) += thermal.o
> +thermal_sys-objs += thermal.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_THERMAL) += thermal_sys.o
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ config ACPI_VIDEO
> tristate "Video"
> depends on X86 && BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE && VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL
> depends on INPUT
> + select THERMAL
> help
> This driver implement the ACPI Extensions For Display Adapters
> for integrated graphics devices on motherboard, as specified in
> @@ -151,6 +152,7 @@ config ACPI_VIDEO
>
> config ACPI_FAN
> tristate "Fan"
> + select THERMAL
> default y
> help
> This driver adds support for ACPI fan devices, allowing user-mode
> @@ -172,6 +174,7 @@ config ACPI_BAY
>
> config ACPI_PROCESSOR
> tristate "Processor"
> + select THERMAL
> default y
> help
> This driver installs ACPI as the idle handler for Linux, and uses
> @@ -188,7 +191,6 @@ config ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
> config ACPI_THERMAL
> tristate "Thermal Zone"
> depends on ACPI_PROCESSOR
> - select THERMAL
> default y
> help
> This driver adds support for ACPI thermal zones. Most mobile and
I wouldn't remove this select. I agree it's not strictly needed right
now because ACPI_THERMAL depends on ACPI_PROCESSOR and ACPI_PROCESSOR
now selects THERMAL, but relying on "inherited" selects that way could
break in the future, and is also not obvious for people not familiar
with the code.
Likewise, I am a little worried that drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c needs
THERMAL but doesn't select it. It works because it depends on
ACPI_THERMAL which depends on ACPI_PROCESSOR which itself selects
THERMAL, but that's again a (2nd order) indirect select which isn't
obvious to the newcomer and could break in the future if dependencies
change. I'd rather have each driver select what it needs regardless of
inherited selects.
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/thermal.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -88,24 +88,10 @@ int thermal_zone_bind_cooling_device(str
> struct thermal_cooling_device *);
> int thermal_zone_unbind_cooling_device(struct thermal_zone_device *, int,
> struct thermal_cooling_device *);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_THERMAL
> struct thermal_cooling_device *thermal_cooling_device_register(char *, void *,
> struct
> thermal_cooling_device_ops
> *);
> void thermal_cooling_device_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *);
> -#else
> -static inline struct thermal_cooling_device
> -*thermal_cooling_device_register(char *c, void *v,
> - struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *t)
> -{
> - return NULL;
> -}
> -static inline
> - void thermal_cooling_device_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *t)
> -{
> -};
> -#endif
>
> #endif /* __THERMAL_H__ */
>
>
Other than that, this patch looks OK to me (except that I'd like to see
drivers/thermal/thermal.c renamed to drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c -
but that's something for Len in git.)
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
