On 3/6/2025 9:32 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:50:30AM -0800, Roman Kisel wrote:
[...]
2. Scheduling. Here, there is the mature KVM and Xen code to find
inspiration in. Xen being the Type 1 hypervisor should likely be
closer to MSHV in my understanding.
Yes and no.
When a hypervisor-based scheduler (either classic or core) is used, the
scheduling model is the same as Xen. In this model, the hypervisor makes
the scheduling decisions.
There is a second scheduler model. In that model, the hypervisor
delegates scheduling to the Linux kernel. The Linux scheduler makes the
scheduling decisions. It is similar to KVM.
We support both. Which model to use largely depends on the workload and
the desired behaviors of the system.
This is purely informational in case people wonder why the run vp
function branches off to two different code paths.
Thanks, now I understand that better :)
[...]
--
Thank you,
Roman
--
Thank you,
Roman