On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:09:03PM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
>
> 在 2025/3/3 18:51, Sudeep Holla 写道:
> > The existing error handling logic in pcc_mbox_irq() is intermixed with the
> > main flow of the function. The command complete check and the complete
> > complete update/acknowledgment are nicely factored into separate functions.
> >
> > Moves error detection and clearing logic into a separate function called:
> > pcc_mbox_error_check_and_clear() by extracting error-handling logic from
> > pcc_mbox_irq().
> >
> > This ensures error checking and clearing are handled separately and it
> > improves maintainability by keeping the IRQ handler focused on processing
> > events.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> > index a0fdafc3ef71d20c73ff58ef065201e6dc911396..e693675ce1fbd8d01d0640b3053a5c1882bdbce7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/pcc.c
> > @@ -269,6 +269,25 @@ static bool pcc_mbox_cmd_complete_check(struct pcc_chan_info *pchan)
> > return !!val;
> > }
> > +static int pcc_mbox_error_check_and_clear(struct pcc_chan_info *pchan)
> > +{
> > + u64 val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = pcc_chan_reg_read(&pchan->error, &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + val &= pchan->error.status_mask;
> > + if (val) {
> > + val &= ~pchan->error.status_mask;
> > + pcc_chan_reg_write(&pchan->error, val);
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void check_and_ack(struct pcc_chan_info *pchan, struct mbox_chan *chan)
> > {
> > struct acpi_pcct_ext_pcc_shared_memory pcc_hdr;
> > @@ -309,8 +328,6 @@ static irqreturn_t pcc_mbox_irq(int irq, void *p)
> > {
> > struct pcc_chan_info *pchan;
> > struct mbox_chan *chan = p;
> > - u64 val;
> > - int ret;
> > pchan = chan->con_priv;
> > @@ -324,15 +341,8 @@ static irqreturn_t pcc_mbox_irq(int irq, void *p)
> > if (!pcc_mbox_cmd_complete_check(pchan))
> > return IRQ_NONE;
> > - ret = pcc_chan_reg_read(&pchan->error, &val);
> > - if (ret)
> > + if (!pcc_mbox_error_check_and_clear(pchan))
> > return IRQ_NONE;
>
> Here should be like below code, right? 0 on success.
>
> if (pcc_mbox_error_check_and_clear(pchan))
> return IRQ_NONE;
Spot on, nice catch. Copied it from pcc_mbox_cmd_complete_check(), will fix
it.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
