On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 10:25:03AM +0100, David Lechner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 12:32 PM Matti Vaittinen > <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > There are some different opinions on this, but on the last patch I did > introducing a new namespace, > the consensus Hmm... I may not call that "the consensus"... > seems to be that putting > the MODULE_IMPORT_NS() in the header file was convenient so that users > of the API don't have to remember to both include the header and add > the import macro. Which I am against because it will diminish the point of prevention of the APIs abuse along with a potential to have the stale headers in the file when the code is moved somewhere else.. So, please do not do that. We have only two abusers currently: the PWM and SPI OFFLOAD. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
