On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:27:48 +0000 <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Add support for ACPI RAS2 feature table (RAS2) defined in the ACPI 6.5 > specification, section 5.2.21 and RAS2 HW based memory scrubbing feature. > > ACPI RAS2 patches were part of the EDAC series [1]. Whilst linux-next now contains the EDAC patches, we shouldn't base a feature submission on it. This should be the same as you did for the CXL tree with a statement that it depends on https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git/log/?h=edac-cxl which is the immutable tag / branch Borislav provided. I doubt there is anything else hitting this code so shouldn't be any need to rebase (I could be wrong though!) Assuming everyone is happy with this series, who is going to pick it up? Borislav via ras.git, or Rafael via acpi.git? I don't really have any preference other than making sure it doesn't fall down the cracks! Jonathan > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20250212143654.1893-1-shiju.jose@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Shiju Jose (2): > ACPI:RAS2: Add ACPI RAS2 driver > ras: mem: Add memory ACPI RAS2 driver > > Documentation/edac/scrub.rst | 73 ++++++ > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 11 + > drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/acpi/ras2.c | 417 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/ras/Kconfig | 11 + > drivers/ras/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/ras/acpi_ras2.c | 383 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/acpi/ras2_acpi.h | 47 ++++ > 8 files changed, 944 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 drivers/acpi/ras2.c > create mode 100644 drivers/ras/acpi_ras2.c > create mode 100644 include/acpi/ras2_acpi.h >
