> > There probably are machines out there which only have one of above > > devices, then only the relevant driver should be loaded. > > I thought the since there is only a small functionality in each part and > the module only registers drivers which are started only if an > appropriate device is present it might be good to integrate it in one > module. (in the S6410 case there is actually a third device FUJ02E1 but > I don't know yet what it is for, there are some notifies for that device > in the DSDT but so far I haven't triggered any of them) A fair point. I guess it really depends on how these devices end up being structured. Modularity enforces separation which can help with maintainability going forward but it can also give rise to a certain amount of code duplication. I'd be interested to see what others think. Regards jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
