On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 03:30:01PM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
>
> 在 2025/3/1 0:32, Sudeep Holla 写道:
[...]
> > This may be correct way of fixing the issue here, but I am questioning the
> > existence of this flag now. I have some rework on this file. I will pick
> This flag is for shared interrupt case on type3. please see:
> 3db174e478cb ("mailbox: pcc: Support shared interrupt for multiple
> subspaces")
>
Yes, I looked at all the history of this patch and I saw I had suggested
it. So it took a while to recall why it is a must. I was reworking some
of the recent change added which I couldn't review and got merged. I was
convinced for a short period this flag is not needed but I was wrong.
I will repost the patch with minor updated to the commit message as part
of my series soon to avoid any conflicts.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
