> Please have a look at this thread: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/21/322 > (in short, the reporter sees APM suspend breakage under stress, occuring > because APM uses our suspending of devices without the freezer). > > It mostly appears to work without the freezer, but that's bacuse no one > actually does things that might break it. I don't think we can rely on users > being so kind to us forever. :-) As far as I'm concerned, it's yet another case of the freezer papering over a problem rather than fixing it properly. If we're going to introduce new callbacks, we should have the right semantic from day 1 -and- fix those problems, rather than going to the same old recursive nonsensical arguments and do things to paper over problems. Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
