Re: [PATCH v3] Weighted interleave auto-tuning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 07:17:15PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> ... snip ...
>> 
>> Unless it's possible we will add more modes in the future, this is kind
>> of overkill for me.  How about something simpler as below?
>> 
>> $ cat auto
>> true
>> $ echo 0 > auto
>> $ cat auto
>> false
>
> We have discussed having a dynamic-mode where the weights might adjust
> on the fly based on system-state, but i think this ends up being
> controlled under mempolicy/dynamic_interleave or something.
>
> So this seems reasonable.
>
>> >  static u8 __rcu *iw_table;
>> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(iw_table_lock);
>> > +static const int weightiness = 32;
>> > +static bool weighted_interleave_auto = true;
>> 
>> I still prefer to use 2 iw_table, one is for default, the other is for
>> manual.  The default one will be used if the manual one is NULL.  Both
>> are protected by RCU.  The default one can be updated upon hotplug
>> blindly.  This makes the whole model easier to be understood IMHO.
>> 
>> What do you think about that.
>> 
>
> only question is, lets say you have
>
> `cat auto node0 node1` -> `true 5 1`
> and you do
> echo 0 > auto
>
> what should a subsequent `cat auto node0 node1` output?
>
> `false 5 1`
> or
> `false 1 1`

IMO, it should be

`false 5 1`

That is, we copy auto-generated weights to manual weights atomically and
use it.

> Then lets say we do
> echo 7 > node0

Now, `cat auto node0 node1` outputs,

`false 7 1`

That is, we delete manual weights and use the auto-generated ones.

> what should
> echo true > auto
> result in?
>
> `true 5 1`
> or
> `true 7 1`

It should be

`true 5 1`

> The current code makes sure that when you switch modes from auto
> to manual, it inherits the current state - instead of there being
> some hidden state that suddenly takes precedence.

I think that we can do that with two weight arrays.

> So I prefer to just have one IW array and no hidden state.

Then, when we switch from manual to auto mode, where to find
auto-generated weights?  Re-calculate them?

---
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux