On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 9:42 PM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rafael > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 at 21:17, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 5:07 PM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Provide an implementation of acpi_get_physical_device_location that can > > > be used when CONFIG_ACPI is not set. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 12 +++++++++--- > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > > > index 2b09e513ecf3..b312a72f48ad 100644 > > > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > > > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > > > @@ -43,9 +43,6 @@ acpi_status > > > acpi_evaluate_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, u32 status_code, > > > struct acpi_buffer *status_buf); > > > > > > -acpi_status > > > -acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld); > > > - > > > bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name); > > > acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method, > > > u64 arg); > > > @@ -60,6 +57,9 @@ bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 funcs); > > > union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, > > > u64 rev, u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4); > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > > > +acpi_status > > > +acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld); > > > + > > > static inline union acpi_object * > > > acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, > > > u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4, > > > @@ -1003,6 +1003,12 @@ static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; } > > > > > > static inline int acpi_wait_for_acpi_ipmi(void) { return 0; } > > > > > > +static inline acpi_status > > > +acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld) > > > +{ > > > + return AE_ERROR; > > > +} > > > > I overlooked this before, sorry. > > > > It generally is not OK to use acpi_status and/or AE_ error codes > > without CONFIG_ACPI and they really only should be used in > > drivers/acpi/ (and not everywhere in there for that matter). > > > > So acpi_get_physical_device_location() needs to be redefined to return > > something different from acpi_status (preferably bool) in order to be > > used in !CONFIG_ACPI code. > > Shall I redefine it to > bool acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct > acpi_pld_info **pld)/ > > For both the ACPI and !ACPI cases? or just for the !ACPI? For both cases, please.