On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 21:56, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 07:56:01PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > Provide an implementation of acpi_device_handle that can be used when
> > CONFIG_ACPI is not set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > index 05f39fbfa485..59a5d110ff54 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -787,6 +787,12 @@ const char *acpi_get_subsystem_id(acpi_handle handle);
> > #define acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(adev, hid2, uid2) (adev && false)
> >
> > struct fwnode_handle;
> > +struct acpi_device;
> > +
> > +static inline acpi_handle acpi_device_handle(struct acpi_device *adev)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> >
> > static inline bool acpi_dev_found(const char *hid)
> > {
> >
>
> Please remove the extra forward declaration of struct acpi_device a few
> lines below this.
Instead I have moved the function under the forward declaration. Let
me know if you disagree.
>
> With that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
--
Ricardo Ribalda
