On 12/4/24 1:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >> >> >> On 2024/10/23 10:02 AM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2024/10/7 11:03 AM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >>>> Hi Rafael, >>>> >>>> On 2024/1/31 7:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 9:30 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The HMAT messages printed at boot, beyond being noisy, can also print >>>>>> details for nodes that are not yet enabled. The primary method to >>>>>> consume HMAT details is via sysfs, and the sysfs interface gates what is >>>>>> emitted by whether the node is online or not. Hide the messages by >>>>>> default by moving them from "info" to "debug" log level. >>>>>> >>>>>> Otherwise, these prints are just a pretty-print way to dump the ACPI >>>>>> HMAT table. It has always been the case that post-analysis was required >>>>>> for these messages to map proximity-domains to Linux NUMA nodes, and as >>>>>> Priya points out that analysis also needs to consider whether the >>>>>> proximity domain is marked "enabled" in the SRAT. >>>>>> >>>>>> Reported-by: Priya Autee <priya.v.autee@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This patch doesn't seem to be included in the tree. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to pick this up in the your tree? Thanks! >>> >>> A gentle ping... >> >> Another gentle ping... > > Rafael acked it, so he probably expected me to take it through the CXL > tree? In any event we can get this queued up in cxl.git unless Rafael > beats me to it and applies it. > I'll pick it up for cxl-next
