Re: [PATCH v3 19/22] ACPI: platform_profile: Check all profile handler to calculate next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 31, 2024, at 12:09 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> As multiple platform profile handlers might not all support the same
> profile, cycling to the next profile could have a different result
> depending on what handler are registered.
>
> Check what is active and supported by all handlers to decide what
> to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> index 5baac1f9a9c0e..9b681884ae324 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> @@ -187,30 +187,41 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_notify);
> 
>  int platform_profile_cycle(void)
>  {
> +	enum platform_profile_option next = PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST;
> +	struct platform_profile_handler *handler;
>  	enum platform_profile_option profile;
> -	enum platform_profile_option next;
> +	unsigned long choices;
>  	int err;
> 
>  	scoped_cond_guard(mutex_intr, return -ERESTARTSYS, &profile_lock) {
> -		if (!cur_profile)
> -			return -ENODEV;
> -
> -		err = cur_profile->profile_get(cur_profile, &profile);
> +		err = platform_profile_get_active(&profile);
>  		if (err)
>  			return err;
> 
> -		next = find_next_bit_wrap(cur_profile->choices, PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
> -					  profile + 1);
> +		choices = platform_profile_get_choices();
> 
> -		if (WARN_ON(next == PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST))
> -			return -EINVAL;
> +		next = find_next_bit_wrap(&choices,
> +					  PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST,
> +					  profile + 1);
> 
> -		err = cur_profile->profile_set(cur_profile, next);
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> +		list_for_each_entry(handler, &platform_profile_handler_list, list) {
> +			err = handler->profile_set(handler, next);
> +			if (err) {
> +				pr_err("Failed to set profile for handler %s\n", handler->name);

Suggest highlighting which profile failed (profile_names[next]).

> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		if (err) {
> +			list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(handler, 
> &platform_profile_handler_list, list) {
> +				err = handler->profile_set(handler, PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED);
> +				if (err)
> +					pr_err("Failed to revert profile for handler %s\n", 
> handler->name);

Suggest 'Failed to revert to balanced profiile for ...'

> +			}
> +		}
>  	}
> 
>  	sysfs_notify(acpi_kobj, NULL, "platform_profile");
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_profile_cycle);
> -- 
> 2.43.0

My note from patch 15 applies here with having choices determined during registration/unregistration.

Mark




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux