[PATCH v3 17/22] ACPI: platform_profile: Add concept of a "custom" profile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When two profile handlers don't agree on the current profile it's ambiguous
what to show to the legacy sysfs interface.

Add a "custom" profile string that userspace will be able to distinguish
this situation when using the legacy sysfs interface.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c  | 1 +
 include/linux/platform_profile.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
index c2bb325ba531c..3128bd16615b6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const char * const profile_names[] = {
 	[PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED] = "balanced",
 	[PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED_PERFORMANCE] = "balanced-performance",
 	[PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE] = "performance",
+	[PLATFORM_PROFILE_CUSTOM] = "custom",
 };
 static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(profile_names) == PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_profile.h b/include/linux/platform_profile.h
index 6aad98f4abaf4..da009c8a402c9 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_profile.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_profile.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ enum platform_profile_option {
 	PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED,
 	PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED_PERFORMANCE,
 	PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE,
+	PLATFORM_PROFILE_CUSTOM,
 	PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST, /*must always be last */
 };
 
-- 
2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux