On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 9:23 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, at 16:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:48 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > >> > >> CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT will soon become optional and cause a build time > >> failure when it is disabled but a driver calls inb()/outb(). At the > >> moment, all architectures that can support ACPI have port I/O, but > >> this is not necessarily the case in the future. > > > > Can addressing this be deferred to that point? > > Yes. I would like to have all of arm64 and riscv be able to turn > off HAS_IOPORT eventually, but nothing depends on doing this > when ACPI is enabled. > > >> Since the embedded controller can only exist when port I/O is > >> active, it makes sense to disable that code on targets that don't > >> have it. The same is true for anything using acpi_os_read_port() > >> and similar functions. > >> > >> Add compile-time conditionals around all of those and their callers. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Should this be split up into smaller patches? > > > > No need, but the ACPICA part is kind of nasty. > > Right, I see. > > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evhandler.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evhandler.c > >> @@ -358,12 +358,13 @@ acpi_ev_install_space_handler(struct acpi_namespace_node *node, > >> handler = acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler; > >> setup = acpi_ev_system_memory_region_setup; > >> break; > >> - > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT > >> case ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO: > >> > >> handler = acpi_ex_system_io_space_handler; > >> setup = acpi_ev_io_space_region_setup; > >> break; > >> +#endif > > > > All changes like the above in the ACPICA code potentially increase the > > number of times when upstream ACPICA patches will have to be ported to > > Linux manually, which in turn increases the number of potential > > mistakes in the process. > > > > I'd rather avoid making them, if possible. > > Understood. Does that mean that on the flip-side we can change > the drivers/acpi/osl.c portion to turn acpi_os_read_port() > and acpi_os_write_port() into a runtime error for configurations > without port I/O, without causing the same maintenance overhead? Yes, that can be done. > The version below builds fine and doesn't touch acpica but > it's a bit harder to predict what would happen at runtime. Sure. > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > index b8924077163b..5ec58c4e0332 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ config ACPI_REV_OVERRIDE_POSSIBLE > > config ACPI_EC_DEBUGFS > tristate "EC read/write access through /sys/kernel/debug/ec" > + depends on HAS_IOPORT > help > Say N to disable Embedded Controller /sys/kernel/debug interface > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile > index 61ca4afe83dc..132357815324 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ acpi-y += resource.o > acpi-y += acpi_processor.o > acpi-y += processor_core.o > acpi-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC) += processor_pdc.o > -acpi-y += ec.o > +acpi-$(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) += ec.o > acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK) += dock.o > acpi-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci_root.o pci_link.o pci_irq.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_MCFG) += pci_mcfg.o > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > index 16917dc3ad60..535d6a72ce1b 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c > @@ -1356,7 +1356,8 @@ static int __init acpi_bus_init(void) > * Do that before calling acpi_initialize_objects() which may trigger EC > * address space accesses. > */ > - acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(); > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT)) > + acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(); > > status = acpi_enable_subsystem(ACPI_NO_ACPI_ENABLE); > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { > @@ -1391,7 +1392,8 @@ static int __init acpi_bus_init(void) > * Maybe EC region is required at bus_scan/acpi_get_devices. So it > * is necessary to enable it as early as possible. > */ > - acpi_ec_dsdt_probe(); > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT)) > + acpi_ec_dsdt_probe(); The above two changes mean that it is not necessary to compile either acpi_ec_ecdt_probe() or acpi_ec_dsdt_probe() at all if CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT is not enabled. > > pr_info("Interpreter enabled\n"); > > @@ -1464,7 +1466,8 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void) > acpi_arm_init(); > acpi_riscv_init(); > acpi_scan_init(); > - acpi_ec_init(); > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT)) > + acpi_ec_init(); And this means that the whole EC driver is not going to work at all then. > acpi_debugfs_init(); > acpi_sleep_proc_init(); > acpi_wakeup_device_init(); > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > index b73b3aa92f3f..326b73ae77a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > @@ -1017,7 +1017,8 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val) > *val = 0; > size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg); > > - if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) { > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) && > + reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) { > u32 val_u32; > acpi_status status; > > @@ -1090,7 +1091,8 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val) > > size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg); > > - if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) { > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) && > + reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) { > acpi_status status; > > status = acpi_os_write_port((acpi_io_address)reg->address, > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c > index 78a81969d90e..04d3864073ba 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c > @@ -642,6 +642,11 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_read_port(acpi_io_address port, u32 *value, u32 width) > { > u32 dummy; > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT)) { > + *value = BIT_MASK(width); > + return AE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; > + } > + > if (value) > *value = 0; > else > @@ -665,6 +670,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_os_read_port); > > acpi_status acpi_os_write_port(acpi_io_address port, u32 value, u32 width) > { > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT)) > + return AE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED; > + > if (width <= 8) { > outb(value, port); > } else if (width <= 16) { The above two changes look reasonable to me. > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c > index 4265814c74f8..8be453d89ef8 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c > @@ -455,7 +455,8 @@ int acpi_processor_pstate_control(void) > { > acpi_status status; > > - if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command || !acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control) > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT) || > + !acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command || !acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control) > return 0; All of the existing callers of acpi_processor_pstate_control() are x86 which has CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT AFAICS. And if you care about the code size, acpi_processor_notify_smm() can go away for !CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT too. > pr_debug("Writing pstate_control [0x%x] to smi_command [0x%x]\n", > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > index 7ecc401fb97f..9d5e6dd542bf 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -2293,7 +2293,8 @@ static int acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device, void *first_pass) > if (device->handler) > goto ok; > > - acpi_ec_register_opregions(device); > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT)) > + acpi_ec_register_opregions(device); I'd rather have an empty stub of acpi_ec_register_opregions() for !CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT instead. > > if (!device->flags.initialized) { > device->flags.power_manageable =