On 01-04-08 17:16, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
This series of patches does some PNP housecleaning and
consolidation.
Quite a series...
[patch 01/37] ISAPNP: move config register addresses out of isapnp.h
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 02/37] PNPACPI: continue after _CRS and _PRS errors
No opinion.
[patch 03/37] PNP: make pnp_add_id() internal to PNP core
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 04/37] PNP: change pnp_add_id() to allocate its own pnp_id structures
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 05/37] PNP: add pnp_eisa_id_to_string()
+void pnp_eisa_id_to_string(u32 id, char *str)
+{
+ id = be32_to_cpu(id);
+ str[0] = '@' + ((id >> 26) & 0x1f);
+ str[1] = '@' + ((id >> 21) & 0x1f);
+ str[2] = '@' + ((id >> 16) & 0x1f);
+ str[3] = hex_asc((id >> 12) & 0xf);
+ str[4] = hex_asc((id >> 8) & 0xf);
+ str[5] = hex_asc((id >> 4) & 0xf);
+ str[6] = hex_asc((id >> 0) & 0xf);
+ str[7] = '\0';
+}
I'd much prefer 'A' - 1 over '@'. While no doubt not a practical issue,
it's more portable that way and more importantly, clearer.
By the way, the original isapnp_parse_id explicitly encodes the top _6_
bits in str[0] (& 0x3f) which seems odd. Bit 31 had better be 0 indeed,
but I wonder why the original didn't just assume such.
Other than that,
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 06/37] PNP: add pnp_alloc_dev()
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 07/37] PNP: make pnp_add_card_id() internal to PNP core
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 08/37] PNP: change pnp_add_card_id() to allocate its own pnp_id
structures
Same problem with hexadecimal as before. Bisection would get a bogus
card id here, but fixed in 09/37.
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 09/37] ISAPNP: pull pnp_add_card_id() out of isapnp_parse_card_id()
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 10/37] PNP: add pnp_alloc_card()
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 11/37] PNPACPI: pnpacpi_encode_ext_irq() wrongly set "irq" instead of
"extended_irq"
No opinion.
[patch 12/37] PNPACPI: use temporaries to reduce repetition
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 13/37] PNPACPI: hoist dma_flags() out of
pnpacpi_parse_allocated_dmaresource()
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 14/37] PNPACPI: extend irq_flags() to set IORESOURCE_IRQ_SHAREABLE
when appropriate
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 15/37] PNPACPI: pass pnp_dev instead of acpi_handle
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 16/37] PNP: remove pnp_resource_table from internal get/set interfaces
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 17/37] PNP: remove more pnp_resource_table arguments
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 18/37] PNP: add pnp_init_resources(struct pnp_dev *) interface
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 19/37] PNP: remove pnp_resource_table from internal
pnp_clean_resource_table interface
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 20/37] PNP: make generic pnp_add_irq_resource()
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 21/37] PNP: make generic pnp_add_dma_resource()
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 22/37] PNP: make generic pnp_add_io_resource()
int pnp_add_io_resource(..., resource_size_t len, ...)
{
[ ... ]
if (len <= 0 || end >= 0x10003) {
len is a u32 or u64, so (len <= 0) == (len == 0)
But:
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 23/37] PNP: make generic pnp_add_mem_resource()
1: Same comment for pnp_add_mem_resource as 22/37
2: There are 4 tests for ACPI_READ_WRITE_MEMORY here which are turned
into IORESOURCE_MEM_WRITEABLE or 0. Not sure, but should they be
turned into IORESOURCE_MEM_WRITEABLE or IORESOURCE_READONLY?
Otherwise and if not,
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 24/37] PNP: use dev_printk when possible
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 25/37] PNPACPI: remove redundant warnings about _CRS/_PRS failures
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 26/37] PNPACPI: remove some pnp_dbg calls
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 27/37] PNP: use conventional "i" for loop indices
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 28/37] PNP: add pnp_get_resource() interface
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 29/37] PNP: convert encoders to use pnp_get_resource(), not
pnp_resource_table
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 30/37] PNP: convert resource accessors to use pnp_get_resource(), not
pnp_resource_table
Is there a reason to not make pnp_{port,mem,irq,dma}_{start,end,flags}()
inlines?
static inline resource_size_t pnp_port_start(struct pnp_dev *dev,
unsigned int bar)
{
struct resource *res = pnp_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IO, bar);
return res->start;
}
and so on.
Also, you have pnp_{port,mem,irq,dma}_valid() returning a resource_size_t.
They should return int, I presume.
[patch 31/37] PNP: convert resource checks to use pnp_get_resource(), not
pnp_resource_table
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 32/37] PNP: convert resource assign functions to use
pnp_get_resource(), not pnp_resource_table
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 33/37] PNP: remove PNP_MAX_* uses
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 34/37] PNP: remove unused interfaces using pnp_resource_table
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 35/37] rtc: dont reference pnp_resource_table directly
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 36/37] PNP: make pnp_resource_table private to PNP core
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
[patch 37/37] PNP: make interfaces private to the PNP core
Acked-By: Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxx>
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
