On Fri Sep 20, 2024 at 7:30 AM EEST, Shuai Xue wrote: > Part of return value comments for memory_failure() were originally > documented at the call site. Move those comments to the function > declaration to improve code readability and to provide developers with > immediate access to function usage and return information. > > Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 7 ------- > mm/memory-failure.c | 9 ++++++--- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > index 2a938f429c4d..c90d8fcd246a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c > @@ -1373,13 +1373,6 @@ static void kill_me_maybe(struct callback_head *cb) > return; > } > > - /* > - * -EHWPOISON from memory_failure() means that it already sent SIGBUS > - * to the current process with the proper error info, > - * -EOPNOTSUPP means hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, > - * > - * In both cases, no further processing is required. > - */ > if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) > return; > > diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c > index 7066fc84f351..7984e0d99d09 100644 > --- a/mm/memory-failure.c > +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c > @@ -2199,9 +2199,12 @@ static void kill_procs_now(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags, > * Must run in process context (e.g. a work queue) with interrupts > * enabled and no spinlocks held. > * > - * Return: 0 for successfully handled the memory error, > - * -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, > - * < 0(except -EOPNOTSUPP) on failure. > + * Return: > + * 0 - success, > + * -EOPNOTSUPP - hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event, > + * -EHWPOISON - the page was already poisoned, potentially > + * kill process, > + * other negative values - failure. > */ > int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags) > { Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> BR, Jarkko