Re: [PATCH] ACPI: thermal: Use strscpy() instead of strcpy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 12/09/2024 à 22:59, Abdul Rahim a écrit :
thermal: prefer strscpy() over strcpy()

strcpy() is generally considered unsafe and use of strscpy() is
recommended [1]

this fixes checkpatch warning:
	WARNING: Prefer strscpy over strcpy

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strcpy [1]
Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
index 78db38c7076e..a35e40976763 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
@@ -796,9 +796,9 @@ static int acpi_thermal_add(struct acpi_device *device)
  		return -ENOMEM;
tz->device = device;
-	strcpy(tz->name, device->pnp.bus_id);
-	strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_THERMAL_DEVICE_NAME);
-	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_THERMAL_CLASS);
+	strscpy(tz->name, device->pnp.bus_id);
+	strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_THERMAL_DEVICE_NAME, MAX_ACPI_DEVICE_NAME_LEN);

Why the 3 parameters version here only?
Is it needed?

CJ

+	strscpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_THERMAL_CLASS);
  	device->driver_data = tz;
acpi_thermal_aml_dependency_fix(tz);





[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux