Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Initial support for SMMUv3 nested translation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 12:29, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 9/12/24 11:42 AM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 05:32, Nicolin Chen<nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:51:30PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> This brings support for the IOMMFD ioctls:
> >>>
> >>>   - IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO
> >>>   - IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT
> >>>   - IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED
> >>>   - ops->enforce_cache_coherency()
> >>>
> >>> This is quite straightforward as the nested STE can just be built in the
> >>> special NESTED domain op and fed through the generic update machinery.
> >>>
> >>> The design allows the user provided STE fragment to control several
> >>> aspects of the translation, including putting the STE into a "virtual
> >>> bypass" or a aborting state. This duplicates functionality available by
> >>> other means, but it allows trivially preserving the VMID in the STE as we
> >>> eventually move towards the VIOMMU owning the VMID.
> >>>
> >>> Nesting support requires the system to either support S2FWB or the
> >>> stronger CANWBS ACPI flag. This is to ensure the VM cannot bypass the
> >>> cache and view incoherent data, currently VFIO lacks any cache flushing
> >>> that would make this safe.
> >>>
> >>> Yan has a series to add some of the needed infrastructure for VFIO cache
> >>> flushing here:
> >>>
> >>>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240507061802.20184-1-yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx/
> >>>
> >>> Which may someday allow relaxing this further.
> >>>
> >>> Remove VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU since it was never used and superseded by
> >>> this.
> >>>
> >>> This is the first series in what will be several to complete nesting
> >>> support. At least:
> >>>   - IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI related fixups
> >>>      https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cover.1722644866.git.nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>   - VIOMMU object support to allow ATS and CD invalidations
> >>>      https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cover.1723061377.git.nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>   - vCMDQ hypervisor support for direct invalidation queue assignment
> >>>      https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cover.1712978212.git.nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>   - KVM pinned VMID using VIOMMU for vBTM
> >>>      https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240208151837.35068-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >>>   - Cross instance S2 sharing
> >>>   - Virtual Machine Structure using VIOMMU (for vMPAM?)
> >>>   - Fault forwarding support through IOMMUFD's fault fd for vSVA
> >>>
> >>> The VIOMMU series is essential to allow the invalidations to be processed
> >>> for the CD as well.
> >>>
> >>> It is enough to allow qemu work to progress.
> >>>
> >>> This is on github:https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/smmuv3_nesting
> >>>
> >>> v2:
> >> As mentioned above, the VIOMMU series would be required to test
> >> the entire nesting feature, which now has a v2 rebasing on this
> >> series. I tested it with a paring QEMU branch. Please refer to:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cover.1724776335.git.nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >> Also, there is another new VIRQ series on top of the VIOMMU one
> >> and this nesting series. And I tested it too. Please refer to:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cover.1724777091.git.nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >>
> >> With that,
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen<nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> > Have you tested the user page fault?
> >
> > I got an issue, when a user page fault happens,
> >   group->attach_handle = iommu_attach_handle_get(pasid)
> > return NULL.
> >
> > A bit confused here, only find IOMMU_NO_PASID is used when attaching
> >
> >   __fault_domain_replace_dev
> > ret = iommu_replace_group_handle(idev->igroup->group, hwpt->domain,
> > &handle->handle);
> > curr = xa_store(&group->pasid_array, IOMMU_NO_PASID, handle, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > not find where the code attach user pasid with the attach_handle.
>
> Have you set iommu_ops::user_pasid_table for SMMUv3 driver?

Thanks Baolu, Nico

Yes, after arm_smmu_ops = {
+       .user_pasid_table       = 1,

find_fault_handler can go inside attach_handle =
iommu_attach_handle_get(IOMMU_NO_PASID);
qemu handler also gets called.

But hardware reports errors and needs reset, still in check.
[Hardware Error]: Hardware error from APEI Generic Hardware Error Source: 0

Thanks




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux