On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 12:52 +0800, KobaK wrote: > PRMT needs to find the correct type of block to > translate the PA-VA mapping for EFI runtime services. > > The issue arises because the PRMT is finding a block of > type EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY, which is not appropriate for > runtime services as described in Section 2.2.2 (Runtime > Services) of the UEFI Specification [1]. Since the PRM handler is > a type of runtime service, this causes an exception > when the PRM handler is called. > > [Firmware Bug]: Unable to handle paging request in EFI runtime > service > WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 4330 at drivers/firmware/efi/runtime- > wrappers.c:341 > __efi_queue_work+0x11c/0x170 > Call trace: > __efi_queue_work+0x11c/0x170 > efi_call_acpi_prm_handler+0x68/0xd0 > acpi_platformrt_space_handler+0x198/0x258 > acpi_ev_address_space_dispatch+0x144/0x388 > acpi_ex_access_region+0x9c/0x118 > acpi_ex_write_serial_bus+0xc4/0x218 > acpi_ex_write_data_to_field+0x168/0x218 > acpi_ex_store_object_to_node+0x1a8/0x258 > acpi_ex_store+0xec/0x330 > acpi_ex_opcode_1A_1T_1R+0x15c/0x618 > acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0x274/0x548 > acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x10c/0x6b8 > acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x140/0x3b0 > acpi_ps_execute_method+0x12c/0x2a0 > acpi_ns_evaluate+0x210/0x310 > acpi_evaluate_object+0x178/0x358 > acpi_proc_write+0x1a8/0x8a0 [acpi_call] > proc_reg_write+0xcc/0x150 > vfs_write+0xd8/0x380 > ksys_write+0x70/0x120 > __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x48 > invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x80/0xf8 > do_el0_svc+0x50/0x110 > el0_svc+0x48/0x1d0 > el0t_64_sync_handler+0x15c/0x178 > el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1b0 > > Find a block with specific type to fix this. > prmt find a block with EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA for prm handler and > find a block with EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE for prm context. > If no suitable block is found, a warning message will be prompted > but the procedue continues to manage the next prm handler. s/procedue/procedure ? > However, if the prm handler is actullay called without proper > allocation, > it would result in a failure during error handling. > > By using the correct memory types for runtime services, > Ensure that the PRM handler and the context are > properly mapped in the virtual address space during runtime, > preventing the paging request error. > > [1] > https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Spec_2_10_Aug29.pdf > > Fixes: cefc7ca46235 ("ACPI: PRM: implement OperationRegion handler > for the PlatformRtMechanism subtype") > Signed-off-by: KobaK <kobak@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mochs@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > Closes: > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409071245.bkGWWtfQ-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ I don't think you need these two lines. This applies when you address the bug in a separate patch. > --- > V2: > 1. format the changelog and add more about error handling. > 2. replace goto > V3: Warn if parts of handler are missed during va-pa translating. > V4: Fix the 0day > --- > drivers/acpi/prmt.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > -- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/prmt.c b/drivers/acpi/prmt.c > index c78453c74ef5..029e8f9db53a 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/prmt.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/prmt.c > @@ -72,15 +72,17 @@ struct prm_module_info { > struct prm_handler_info handlers[] > __counted_by(handler_count); > }; > > -static u64 efi_pa_va_lookup(u64 pa) > +static u64 efi_pa_va_lookup(u64 pa, u32 type) > { > efi_memory_desc_t *md; > u64 pa_offset = pa & ~PAGE_MASK; > u64 page = pa & PAGE_MASK; > > for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) { > - if (md->phys_addr < pa && pa < md->phys_addr + > PAGE_SIZE * md->num_pages) > + if ((md->type == type) && > + (md->phys_addr < pa && pa < md->phys_addr + > PAGE_SIZE * md->num_pages)) { > return pa_offset + md->virt_addr + page - md- > >phys_addr; > + } > } > > return 0; > @@ -148,9 +150,18 @@ acpi_parse_prmt(union acpi_subtable_headers > *header, const unsigned long end) > th = &tm->handlers[cur_handler]; > > guid_copy(&th->guid, (guid_t *)handler_info- > >handler_guid); > - th->handler_addr = (void > *)efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info->handler_address); > - th->static_data_buffer_addr = > efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info->static_data_buffer_address); > - th->acpi_param_buffer_addr = > efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info->acpi_param_buffer_address); > + th->handler_addr = > + (void *)efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info- > >handler_address, EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE); > + th->static_data_buffer_addr = > + efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info- > >static_data_buffer_address, EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA); > + th->acpi_param_buffer_addr = > + efi_pa_va_lookup(handler_info- > >acpi_param_buffer_address, EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA); > + > + if (!th->handler_addr || !th->static_data_buffer_addr > || !th->acpi_param_buffer_addr) > + pr_warn( > + "Idx: %llu, Parts of handler(GUID: > %pUB) are missed, handler_addr %llx, data_addr %llx, param_addr > %llx", > + cur_handler, th->handler_addr, > + th->static_data_buffer_addr, th- > >acpi_param_buffer_addr); have you run build test for this patch? drivers/acpi/prmt.c: In function ‘acpi_parse_prmt’: ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:25: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects a matching ‘long long unsigned int’ argument [-Wformat=] 5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001" /* ASCII Start Of Header */ | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/printk.h:437:25: note: in definition of macro ‘printk_index_wrap’ 437 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ^~~~ ./include/linux/printk.h:518:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘printk’ 518 | printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:12:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘KERN_SOH’ 12 | #define KERN_WARNING KERN_SOH "4" /* warning conditions */ | ^~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/printk.h:518:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘KERN_WARNING’ 518 | printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/acpi/prmt.c:161:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘pr_warn’ 161 | pr_warn( | ^~~~~~~ -rui > } while (++cur_handler < tm->handler_count && (handler_info = > get_next_handler(handler_info))); > > return 0; > @@ -250,8 +261,16 @@ static acpi_status > acpi_platformrt_space_handler(u32 function, > > handler = find_prm_handler(&buffer->handler_guid); > module = find_prm_module(&buffer->handler_guid); > - if (!handler || !module) > - goto invalid_guid; > + if (!handler || !module) { > + buffer->prm_status = > PRM_HANDLER_GUID_NOT_FOUND; > + return AE_OK; > + } > + > + if (!handler->handler_addr || !handler- > >static_data_buffer_addr || > + !handler->acpi_param_buffer_addr) { > + buffer->prm_status = PRM_HANDLER_ERROR; > + return AE_OK; > + } > > ACPI_COPY_NAMESEG(context.signature, "PRMC"); > context.revision = 0x0; > @@ -274,8 +293,10 @@ static acpi_status > acpi_platformrt_space_handler(u32 function, > case PRM_CMD_START_TRANSACTION: > > module = find_prm_module(&buffer->handler_guid); > - if (!module) > - goto invalid_guid; > + if (!module) { > + buffer->prm_status = > PRM_HANDLER_GUID_NOT_FOUND; > + return AE_OK; > + } > > if (module->updatable) > module->updatable = false; > @@ -286,8 +307,10 @@ static acpi_status > acpi_platformrt_space_handler(u32 function, > case PRM_CMD_END_TRANSACTION: > > module = find_prm_module(&buffer->handler_guid); > - if (!module) > - goto invalid_guid; > + if (!module) { > + buffer->prm_status = > PRM_HANDLER_GUID_NOT_FOUND; > + return AE_OK; > + } > > if (module->updatable) > buffer->prm_status = > UPDATE_UNLOCK_WITHOUT_LOCK; > @@ -302,10 +325,6 @@ static acpi_status > acpi_platformrt_space_handler(u32 function, > } > > return AE_OK; > - > -invalid_guid: > - buffer->prm_status = PRM_HANDLER_GUID_NOT_FOUND; > - return AE_OK; > } > > void __init init_prmt(void)
