On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 1:35 AM David Wang <00107082@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > When acpi_evaluate_dsm failed, the warning message lacks the rev > and func information which is available and helpful. > For example, iwlwifi would make _DSM queries for lari config, > and when it failed, all warning messages are all the same: > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade (0x1001) > With this patch, the warnings would be more informative: > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:1 (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:6 (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:7 (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:8 (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:3 (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:9 (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:10 (0x1001) > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-788f-c64d-a5b3-1f738e285ade rev:0 func:12 (0x1001) > > Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/utils.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c > index ae9384282273..6de542d99518 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c > @@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 func, > > if (ret != AE_NOT_FOUND) > acpi_handle_warn(handle, > - "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb (0x%x)\n", guid, ret); > + "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb rev:%lld func:%lld (0x%x)\n", > + guid, rev, func, ret); > > return NULL; > } > -- Applied as 6.12 material with some edits in the subject and changelog, thanks!
