From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:28:55 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There are a few of duplication of the same for-loop against GPIO
> suffixes. This series addresses that along with proposal to eliminate
> the exported gpio_suffix_count by converting the array to be
> NULL-terminated.
>
> v2:
> - fixed a rebase issue (LKP)
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/5] gpiolib: Introduce for_each_gpio_property_name() helper
commit: ef3d4b94d2d88b160887ff9ca737a5f8ec101579
[2/5] gpiolib: swnode: Unify return code variable name
commit: e42fce0ff99658b5b43e8dae4f7acc43d38a00ef
[3/5] gpiolib: swnode: Introduce swnode_gpio_get_reference() helper
commit: 7fd6809888a82055fcca9d14417d5e2675f0acc5
[4/5] gpiolib: swnode: Make use of for_each_gpio_property_name()
commit: a975a64692c39991fdde2f1d990b7bdd48d183fc
[5/5] gpiolib: Replace gpio_suffix_count with NULL-terminated array
commit: 4b91188dced811e2d867574b672888406cb7114c
Best regards,
--
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
