> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2024 3:59 PM
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: acpica-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alex Williamson
> <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joerg Roedel
> <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>; Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rafael J.
> Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>; Robert Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>; Robin
> Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>; Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>;
> Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jean-
> Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>; Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Michael Shavit <mshavit@xxxxxxxxxx>; Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ACPI/IORT: Support CANWBS memory access flag
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 02:36:31PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> > > @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ struct acpi_iort_memory_access {
> > >
> > > #define ACPI_IORT_MF_COHERENCY (1)
> > > #define ACPI_IORT_MF_ATTRIBUTES (1<<1)
> > > +#define ACPI_IORT_MF_CANWBS (1<<2)
> >
> > I think we need to update Document number to E.f in IORT section in
> > this file. Also isn't it this file normally gets updated through ACPICA pull ?
>
> I don't know anything about the ACPI process..
>
> Can someone say for sure what to do here?
