On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 02:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 27 of March 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > There is absolutely no point getting a second struct anymore. > > > > > > I obviously disagree with that opinion, so please elaborate. > > > > Well, what does it bring you ? Why can't it be one struct ? To save > > space in the data area ? > > Mostly, but not only that. > > There are users of 'struct pm_ops' that aren't even supposed to define the > _noirq callbacks (device types and device classes), so I thought it would be > better to introduce a separate _noirq struct after all. Make sense... USB has no use of noirq for example. Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
