Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Only evaluate the Intel _OSC and _PDC on platforms with HWP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/15/2024 05:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 9:33 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> wrote:

The UUID 4077A616-290C-47BE-9EBD-D87058713953 and _PDC methods are
only used on Intel platforms with HWP support.

I beg to differ.  See arch_acpi_set_proc_cap_bits() definition.

Ah I see; thanks for sharing.  I agree with you.


Attempting to evaluate them and showing messages on hardware without
HWP is pointless needlessly noisy.

Gate the code on X86_FEATURE_HWP.

Not really.

I guess this really started getting noisy in 6.6 (9527264).

Would you be open to downgrading to debug instead?


Cc: PradeepVineshReddy (Pradeep Vinesh Reddy) Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@xxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: CL Lin <clin41@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 7a0dd35d62c9..84848b5e65d6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -597,6 +597,8 @@ static bool __init acpi_early_processor_osc(void)

  void __init acpi_early_processor_control_setup(void)
  {
+       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP))
+               return;
         if (acpi_early_processor_osc()) {
                 pr_info("_OSC evaluated successfully for all CPUs\n");
         } else {
--
2.43.0






[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux