On 6/15/2024 05:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 9:33 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The UUID 4077A616-290C-47BE-9EBD-D87058713953 and _PDC methods are
only used on Intel platforms with HWP support.
I beg to differ. See arch_acpi_set_proc_cap_bits() definition.
Ah I see; thanks for sharing. I agree with you.
Attempting to evaluate them and showing messages on hardware without
HWP is pointless needlessly noisy.
Gate the code on X86_FEATURE_HWP.
Not really.
I guess this really started getting noisy in 6.6 (9527264).
Would you be open to downgrading to debug instead?
Cc: PradeepVineshReddy (Pradeep Vinesh Reddy) Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@xxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: CL Lin <clin41@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 7a0dd35d62c9..84848b5e65d6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -597,6 +597,8 @@ static bool __init acpi_early_processor_osc(void)
void __init acpi_early_processor_control_setup(void)
{
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP))
+ return;
if (acpi_early_processor_osc()) {
pr_info("_OSC evaluated successfully for all CPUs\n");
} else {
--
2.43.0