On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 12:01:17PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 13.05.24 12:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:56:10AM +0200, Laura Nao wrote: > >> Following the relocation of the function call outside of > >> __acpi_find_gpio(), move the ACPI device NULL check to > >> acpi_can_fallback_to_crs(). > > > > Thank you, I'll add this to my tree as we have already the release happened. > > I will be available after v6.10-rc1 is out. > > Hmm, what exactly do you mean with that? It sounds as you only want to > add this to the tree once -rc1 is out -- which seems likely at this > point, as that patch is not yet in -next. If that's the case allow me to > ask: why? Because: - that's the policy of Linux Next (do not include what's not supposed to be merged during merge window), Cc'ed to Stephen to clarify, it might be that I'm mistaken - the process of how we maintain the branches is to have them based on top of rc1 (rarely on other rcX and never on an arbitrary commit from vanilla > I'd say it should be fixes rather sooner than later, as other > people might run into this as well and then have to deal with bisecing, > reporting, ... Yes, but we have a process during merge window, it's special and different from vX.Y-rc1..vX.Y times. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
