On Tuesday, 25 of March 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 25. März 2008 15:33:22 schrieb Alan Stern: > > > so I'd say a > > > failure to resume is just a limited subcase of a device vanishing during > > > sleep. > > > > I'll go along with that. If a device vanishes during sleep, the PM > > core isn't responsible for unregistering it -- the device's subsystem > > is. > > Yes, that makes sense. You are right. Still, if ->resume() returns an error, does it make sense, from the PM core's point of view, to execute ->complete() for that device, for example? If you think it does, that behavior should be clearly documented (I didn't think about that before). Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
