Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ACPI/NUMA: Return memblk modification state from numa_fill_memblks()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Richter wrote:
> When registering a memory range a possibly overlapping memory block
> will be extended instead of creating a new one. If both ranges exactly
> overlap, the blocks remain unchanged and are just reused. The
> information if a memblock was extended is useful for diagnostics.

What diagnostic flow is this useful for?

I feel like this post-hoc debug prints for problems we never expect to
have again, or is there an enduring need for this?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux