Hi Palmer, Gentle ping... On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:03 PM yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Palmer, > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:29 PM Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 4/17/24 22:43, Yunhui Cui wrote: > > > Before cacheinfo can be built correctly, we need to initialize level > > > and type. Since RSIC-V currently does not have a register group that > > > describes cache-related attributes like ARM64, we cannot obtain them > > > directly, so now we obtain cache leaves from the ACPI PPTT table > > > (acpi_get_cache_info()) and set the cache type through split_levels. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> > > > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c > > > index 30a6878287ad..e47a1e6bd3fe 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/cpu.h> > > > #include <linux/of.h> > > > #include <asm/cacheinfo.h> > > > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > > > > > > static struct riscv_cacheinfo_ops *rv_cache_ops; > > > > > > @@ -78,6 +79,27 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu) > > > struct device_node *prev = NULL; > > > int levels = 1, level = 1; > > > > > > + if (!acpi_disabled) { > > > + int ret, fw_levels, split_levels; > > > + > > > + ret = acpi_get_cache_info(cpu, &fw_levels, &split_levels); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > + > > > + BUG_ON((split_levels > fw_levels) || > > > + (split_levels + fw_levels > this_cpu_ci->num_leaves)); > > > + > > > + for (; level <= this_cpu_ci->num_levels; level++) { > > > + if (level <= split_levels) { > > > + ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level); > > > + ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level); > > > + } else { > > > + ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level); > > > + } > > > + } > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > + > > > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) > > > ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level); > > > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) > > > > Yes, looks good. > > > > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Could you help review this patchset? Thanks. > > Thanks, > Yunhui Thanks, Yunhui